Credits
Editor: Godfrey Mwaloma
Please email me to submit a story or to unsubscribe: g.mwaloma@cgiar.org
Visit the PRESA Website for regular news and features!
|
|
Latest tools and resources
Pro-poor
Rewards for Environmental Services in Africa: 2008 - 2011
[PDF, 1.4MB]
This publication describes PRESA's work since 2008 in seven sites
across Africa.
Estimating
the Opportunity Costs of REDD+
This
training manual shares hands-on experiences from field programs and
presents the essential practical and theoretical steps, methods and
tools to estimate the opportunity costs of REDD+ at national level.
GenRiver
and FlowPer river flow persistence models. User Manual Version 2.0
A manual on the GenRiver and FlowPer generic river flow persistence
models.
Forests
and Society - Responding to Global Drivers of Change
A book discussing the challenges and opportunities related to the
global drivers of change that affect forests and society.
State
of the World's Forests 2011
This report by the Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) aims
to promote awareness and understanding of the multiple ways forests
support people's
livelihoods.
Visit our tools
and resources page for more.
|
| |
|
Welcome to the June 2011 PRESA E-News
|
|
Welcome to the 8th edition of the PRESA newsletter.
From July 2011, PRESA and the Katoomba Group will merge
their newsletters to provide you with a comprehensive outlook on
payments for environmental services from Africa and the rest of the
world.
For this issue, we feature the first steps we have taken
in using science-based evidence to turn research to action by embarking
on a pilot scheme in payments for watershed services at Sasumua, Kenya.
Watch out for updates on the long and winding road to negotiations, as
we harmonise knowledge and understanding with the ambitions of various
stakeholders. We expect this story to end in a happily-ever-after
situation involving a fair and efficient contract between land owners
in the Sasumua watershed and a buyer.
As always, we welcome your comments and suggestions.
Happy reading!
|
|
Fertile ground for rewards for environmental services
in Uganda
Strengthening local institutions is key in ensuring the
involvement of smallholder farmers in payments for environmental
service (PES) deals. PRESA worked with Nature
Harness Initiatives
(NAHI) in Uganda to prepare local stakeholders to participate in carbon
PES along River Wambabya in the Albertine Rift, and watershed PES at
the Rushebeya-Kanyabaha wetland.
The work involved cataloguing the potential sellers, intermediaries and
private-sector buyers of environmental services in the two landscapes.
Awareness creation was conducted among potential sellers at
community level. These included existing groups and networks of land
owners, forest owners, people engaged in forest and wetland-based
enterprises, parish wetland management committees and other users of
forest and wetland resources.
The potential buyers included Kisiizi Hospital Power Company
(at Rushebeya-Kanyabaha) and British American Tobacco and McLeod Russel
Uganda( at Wambabya). Dialogue on PES was initiated among the
potential buyers and government institutions. At the Wambabya riverine
forest system, the two private sector companies have contributed
greatly to ecosystem conservation in their areas of operation.
At the Rushebeya-Kanyabaha wetland, NAHI brought together all key
stakeholders in a workshop. An action plan was developed calling for an
uncultivated reserve of at least 5 metres from the river banks, in
return for support in promoting alternative income generating
activities. The Kisiizi hospital hydro-dam management expressed
willingness to pay for the management of the wetland. There are high
hopes that this will be the first payments for environmental services
scheme in the area.
NAHI, with PRESA support, assisted individual forest owners to develop
their respective forest
restoration plans. 110 such plans are being implemented under the
Sustainable Ecosystems (Forests and Fresh water) management project in
Uganda, supported by British American Tobacco.
Beyond its collaboration with PRESA, NAHI used the maps
and forest
management interventions generated with PRESA in a World Bank and
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) project intended to
institute a payment scheme for selected forest owners.
“The main objective of our work with PRESA is to
establish
institutional frameworks to facilitate reward mechanisms for
environmental services in Rushebeya-Kanyabaha and Wambabya,” says NAHI.
Click here to download
the full report by NAHI [PDF, 1.2MB).
|
|
Training workshops on payments for environmental
services to be held in Nairobi, Kenya, 8 – 12 August, 2011
Can payments for ecosystem services (PES) - including
revenues from projects focused on reducing emissions from degradation
and deforestation (REDD+) - create new incentives for sustainable land
use management in Africa? What are the opportunities? And what risks
exist, for whom?
These questions, and more, will be at the core of a
workshop, jointly offered by the World Agroforestry Center
and the international Katoomba
Group with support from the United
Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
The workshop on Payments
for Ecosystem Services (PES) and Reducing Emissions from Degradation
and Deforestation (REDD+) runs from 8 to 9 August 2011.
Participants will include policy makers, private sector stakeholders,
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from Cameroon, Guinea, Kenya,
Tanzania and Uganda. The content will focus on providing
participants with the following:
- An introduction to PES and REDD+
- A set of guidelines for selecting the most promising
PES and REDD+ sites, and
- An overview of how PES can be implemented.
The second workshop, scheduled for 10 to 12 August 2011,
and also jointly offered by the World Agroforestry Center and the
international Katoomba Group, will train project implementers (mainly
NGOs) from Kenya and Uganda on social impact assessment in the design
and implementation of PES projects.
We will be posting regular updates on the PRESA website
as the event draws closer.
|
|
Towards a rewards scheme for cleaner water
The
Sasumua reservoir in Kenya supplies the capital city, Nairobi, with 20%
of its fresh water needs. Through various studies at the
Sasumua
landscape, PRESA generated evidence linking improved watershed
services
to good land-use practices such as terraces, contour farming, grass
filter strips and grass waterways.
We even went ahead to quantify
watershed services and estimate the expected costs and benefits of the
said land-use practices. We conducted studies on willingness to pay
among potential buyers, and willingness to accept payments among
potential sellers.
With this package of evidence, we made a case for a
rewards-based
approach for enhancing Sasumua watershed management, to a
multi-stakeholder meeting at the World Agroforestry Centre headquarters
in Nairobi. The meeting included government, local community
representatives, NGOs and the Nairobi City Water and Sewerage Company.
The evidence showed that more than 50% of sedimentation
was generated from privately owned plots, which cannot be easily
influenced to adopt the recommended land-use practices. PES could be a
cost-effective approach where savings from reduced water-treatment
costs could reward and motivate farmers to engage in catchment
conservation. All stakeholders agreed to this approach.
100 landowners at Sasumua in hot-spot areas expressed
willingness to participate as potential suppliers of environmental
services for improved water quality. These are already organised in a
Water
Resources Users Association (WRUA) under the Water Resources Management
Authority (WRMA). The question was where the finances for such a scheme
would come from. There
were two options: the Nairobi
City Water and Sewerage Company or
the Water Services Trust Fund
to which the Nairobi water company makes
annual water abstraction payments as required by the Water Act of 2002.
Dialogue continues with potential buyers to determine
how to address these legal and institutional limitations.
If successful, the Sasumua work could be a
break-through in establishing evidence-based payments for watershed
services. Lessons could be replicated by other water resource user
associations in Kenya.
|
|
Carbon payments for watershed management
Who said carbon cannot pay for water?
PRESA facilitated the expansion of Ecotrust's
work on Trees for Global
benefits to enable farmers growing trees in the River Mobuku watershed
in Uganda to access carbon payments. Mobuku River watershed lies at the
foothills of the Rwenzori Mountains.
This article is a summary of
activities by Ecotrust Uganda and PRESA, intended to get farmers into
carbon offsetting.
Read the article here.
|
|
Showing them how it works
PRESA is in the process of setting up prototype schemes
for environmental service payments in Guinea to demonstrate how the
rewards approach can address ecosystem degradation at the Fouta Djallon
highlands.
A prototype scheme for watershed service payments is
getting established in the Coyah area, east of Conakry, to demonstrate
to the Coyah water bottling company how a reward for environmental
services scheme might be implemented. The company is interested in
buying watershed services from communities.
In addition, another prototype scheme is to be set up
deep in the Fouta Djallon highlands, at Balayan Souroumba. Here, the
plan is for biodiversity payments based on critical chimpanzee habitat
maps. The work at Balayan Souroumba is supported with funding from the
United Nations Development Programme.
|
|
Testing rewards for environmental services at the
Uluguru Mountains
Building
on research on willingness-to-accept among potential environmental
service sellers, who are local landowners, PRESA set up a prototype
payment mechanism at our
site in the Uluguru Mountains. Contracts were developed with 200
households for planting 20,000 tree seedlings of Khaya anthotheca (an indigenous
timber tree), Tectona grandis
(teak) and Faidherbia albida
(an indigenous tree that improves soil fertility and provides firewood.
In exchange, farmers are get 300 Tanzania Shillings (US$0.20) a year
for each surviving seedling.
A year after establishing these mechanisms, farmers
are expressing willingness to continue managing the trees even when
payments stop completely. The training they got on tree planting, the
free seedlings they received, and the expected additional benefits from
tree products are enough to satisfy farmers' payment demands.
What started off as a conditional, commoditized payment
mechanism has evolved into a co-investment type with less emphasis on
conditionality.
|
|
News briefs
Nyando and Yala basins
Kenya:
The Western Kenya stakeholders' consortium at
the Nyando and Yala river basins will continue to make the case for
publicly-funded
payments for environmental services. Meanwhile, PRESA and the United
Nations Development Programme (UNDP) are working on an atlas of
environmental services for the Nyando and Yala basins. The atlas will
be produced by synthesizing information accumulated from various
projects.
Upper Tana basin:
PRESA participated in the project design of TanNRM, a programme
proposed by the International Fund for
Agricultural Development (IFAD)
to tackle land degradation in the upper catchment of the Tana River in
Kenya.
Usambara Mountains:
We are currently studying the feasibility of reducing emissions from
deforestation and degradation (REDD) at the East Usambara Mountains in
Tanzania. The focus is on land use trade-offs, benefit sharing and
delineation of
sub-national REDD interventions.
|
|
Researchers and communities see things differently
From the Science for Environment Policy bulletin
A recent analysis highlights the difference between the
academic and the practical concept of ecosystem services. It suggests
that academic science aims to discover and apply general and timeless
concepts to measure ecosystem services, whereas in practice,
stakeholders’ valuations of ecosystem services vary with place and time.
The term ‘ecosystem service’ was first used in the early 1980s to
provide a framework for understanding ecosystem processes in terms of
their contribution to human well-being. Since then, a growing body of
research has discussed how to value ecosystem services so that these
services are acknowledged and the ecosystems that provide them are
conserved.
The researchers argue that the academic literature about ecosystem
services relies on a conceptual basis that differs dramatically from
the kinds of information that stakeholders depend on when evaluating
ecosystem services.
Ecologists and other scientists seek knowledge that is centralised,
collaborative, replicable, and based on consensus. In contrast, the
information used by stakeholders to set values tends to be dispersed,
temporary, local and dependent on existing practices and institutions.
The analysis illustrates this difference with three well-known examples
of ecosystem services: pollination of citrus and almond trees by bees,
pest control by birds and wastewater treatment by wetlands.
Read the detailed analysis here
....
|
|
Other news
Farmers
benefit by providing environmental services
More
trees on farms
Global
forestry
institutions
call
for more community-based forest management
Another
Missing
Link
in
Climate Change Policy: Trees Outside Forests
Putting
trees
on
farms
fundamental to future agricultural development
Mapping
the
Value
of
Watershed Services
|
|
Upcoming events
'Ecosystem
Markets: Making
Them Work' 28 June – 1 July 2011, Wisconsin, USA
The 4th Annual Ecosystem Markets Conference brings together the world’s
top thought and policy leaders to determine how to drive ecosystem
service markets forward. Details
>>.
Africa Carbon Forum, 4 - 6
July 2011, Marrakech, Morroco
The African Carbon Forum is a trade fair and knowledge sharing platform
for carbon investments in the region. Visit the
website >>.
Training Workshops on
Payments for Environmental Services (PES), 8 - 12 August 2011, Nairobi,
Kenya
This workshop is being offered to policy makers, private sector
stakeholders, NGOs and farmer associations, which could in the future
become PES project implementers. Click
here for details.
|
|